As HAESCO (http://www.haesco.org) was a supporting organisation for the SustainaBuild conference in Hong Kong last Wednesday, I decided to attend, a decision I would regret later. The pitch for the event was sustainable design of buildings, but shouldn’t such events that tout sustainability do more than just talk?
There were some great speakers, and bad powerpoints – it was bullet point city (they should have read Garr Reynolds book Presentation Zen).
Most of the speakers started laying out the current dire situation, some even used stats from USA. Yet as the day dragged on, nobody had mentioned the elephant in the room, she had been strangely silent. So in the final open forum, I had to ask the obvious question:
Considering all the disastrous predictions that we had heard during the day, shouldn’t green building assessments, whether using Hong Kong BEAM, or another system be compulsory?
Honestly, I was expecting the long winded non-committal answers comprised of the usual arguments for delaying regulation, I am sure you have heard them before, you know the ones, they extol additional stakeholder engagement while engaging possible future policy initiatives etc and so forth. It was a great surprise, one speaker after another respond with an fairly unequivocal affirmative answer.
It was an interesting event, in my view marred by refreshments provided with disposal paper cups, paper plates littering the breakout area. You would think that the organisers The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM) to do better, wouldn’t you?
Time is running out, we all agree, yet sustainability proponents and organisers of these events are not leading by example, and should not be serving up even more material for our the overburdened landfill sites.
Kelcroft E&M Limited